Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Evan Furness vs Marc Giner Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Furness vs Giner analysis and find out who is favored!
Evan Furness vs Marc Giner Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Furness 1 - 0 Giner
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Furness has won 45.07% of points on their second serve, while Giner has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Furness, in recent form, has won 52.07% of their opponent's second serve points, while Giner has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.27% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Furness has saved 55.6% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Giner has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Furness has won 46.67% of matches played (W/L 14/ 16), with Giner winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Furness has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 72% (W/L 84/ 32), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Giner has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 415/ 250), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 15% (W/L 2/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Furness has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.06% of matches (W/L 8/ 9), where as Giner has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Furness winning 1 times and Giner being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Furness winning 2 and Giner winning 0. The last match between Furness and Giner was at the Portugal F7 (Porto), 11-04-2018, First, Clay with Evan Furness getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:58:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Furness and Giner have played a deciding set 0 times, with Furness winning 0 times and Giner 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Furness winning 0, and Giner 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Furness has played against opponents with an average rank of 222.7 while Giner has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Furness has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Giner has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Furness has converted 47.64% of breakpoint opportunities, and Giner has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
848
Rank
197
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
245
High
33
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
59% (290-205)
Career Total W/L
61% (423-268)
47% (14-16)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$5,730
Career Prize Money
$900
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Evan Furness vs Marc Giner For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Furness VS Giner
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Evan Furness | Marc Giner |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:58:0 | 0:58:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (31/45) | 62% (31/50) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (22/31) | 48% (15/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (9/14) | 32% (6/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 20% (1/5) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (29/50) | 31% (14/45) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Evan Furness
Player
Marc Giner
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Evan Furness | Marc Giner |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (14/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (33/33) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (310/321) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 42% (8/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 60 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 108 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:34 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 222.7 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1246/2067) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (790/1246) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (370/821) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (101/212) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (826/1941) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 46% (6/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 47% (8/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 46% (13/28) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (16/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (16/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (14/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Evan Furness Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Evan Furness
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
77 of
127)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
59 of
127)
119
Total Points Won
105
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Dan Added
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Oscar Lacides
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Reymond
Player
Evan Furness
42%
(
38 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
37%
(
19 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Evan Furness
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
9
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Alexis Gautier
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
9
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Evan Furness
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
43%
(
31 of
72)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eero Vasa
Player
Evan Furness
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Evan Furness
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Marc Giner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Zhurbin
Player
Marc Giner
80%
(
55 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
15 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 7-6(4) ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Kobelt
Player
Marc Giner
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitriy Voronin
Player
Marc Giner
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve %
79%
(
38 of
48)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Marc Giner
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marc Giner
Player
Georg Winkler
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
104)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
104)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Giner
Player
Lenny Hampel
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Marc Giner
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
Player
Marc Giner
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
81%
(
42 of
52)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marc Giner
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
46%
(
36 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marc Giner
Player
Mikhail Korovin
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Furness Vs Giner Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Furness are available here and Giner photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Evan Furness
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
